Evaluation of liver fibrosis staging in patients with chronic hepatitis via the gadolinium washout rate: a comparative study with magnetic resonance elastography and pathology

利用钆清除率评估慢性肝炎患者肝纤维化分期:与磁共振弹性成像和病理学的比较研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver fibrosis, which affects over 200 million patients with chronic hepatitis across the world, is a critical prognostic determinant, and its accurate staging is necessary for guiding interventions. Although biopsy remains the gold standard, its invasiveness and sampling variability necessitate the development of reliable noninvasive alternatives. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) offers high diagnostic accuracy but is limited by cost and hardware requirements. Gadolinium-based agents [e.g., gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)] enable hemodynamic quantification, yet no integrated metric combines washout and wash-in dynamics for fibrosis staging. This study aimed to develop and validate the gadolinium washout rate (GWR)-a novel model integrating multiphase T1 mapping washout (renal clearance) and wash-in (hepatocellular uptake) features-for precise, accessible liver fibrosis staging. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 174 patients with chronic hepatitis. Liver T1 mapping [unenhanced, 5-minute delayed, and 120-minute hepatobiliary phase (HBP)] and biopsy were performed. GWR, the relative enhancement rate of the HBP and delayed phase in the T1 mode and MRE were compared via Pearson correlation, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and fivefold cross-validation. RESULTS: GWR and MRE showed strong correlations with fibrosis stages (GWR: R=0.485-0.533; MRE: R=0.454-0.683; P<0.001). For ≥ F3 fibrosis, GWR, as compared to MRE, had a higher hazard ratio (37.32 vs. 7.35) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.959 vs. 0.912). Cross-validation confirmed GWR's robustness (AUC =0.959, accuracy=97.1%, and sensitivity=0.929). CONCLUSIONS: GWR is superior to MRE in diagnosing advanced fibrosis (≥ F3), offering higher predictive values and clinical net benefit. It provides a cost-effective, noninvasive alternative to MRE.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。