A controlled study of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI compared with enhanced CT in assessing lesion status after TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma

一项对照研究比较了Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MRI与增强CT在评估肝细胞癌经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)后病灶状态方面的差异

阅读:3

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic capability of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in assessing lesion status following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in comparison to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). METHODS: A total of 56 patients with HCC who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and CECT scans post-TACE were initially enrolled. The ability of both imaging modalities to differentiate between surviving, new, or necrotic lesions was assessed, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or interventional diagnostic results as the reference standard. Detection rates were compared using the chi-square test, while sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were analyzed with McNemar's test. RESULTS: After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 48 patients were eventually included in the analysis. The reference standard identified 14 cases of surviving lesions, 19 of new lesions, and 15 of necrotic lesions. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.9% (31/33), specificity of 100% (15/15), and a Youden index of 0.939, whereas CECT exhibited a sensitivity of 51.5% (17/33), specificity of 60.0% (9/15), and a Youden index of 0.115. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI possesses superior diagnostic value for evaluating lesion status in HCC post-TACE compared to CECT, as evidenced by significant differences in sensitivity and specificity (p < 0.05).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。