Abstract
Background MR elastography (MRE) has been shown to have excellent performance for noninvasive liver fibrosis staging. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the precision and test-retest repeatability of stiffness measurement with MRE in the multicenter setting. Purpose To determine the precision and test-retest repeatability of stiffness measurement with MRE across multiple centers using the same phantoms. Materials and Methods In this study, three cylindrical phantoms made of polyvinyl chloride gel mimicking different degrees of liver stiffness in humans (phantoms 1-3: soft, medium, and hard stiffness, respectively) were evaluated. Between January 2021 and January 2022, phantoms were circulated between five different centers and scanned with 10 MRE-equipped clinical 1.5-T and 3-T systems from three major vendors, using two-dimensional (2D) gradient-recalled echo (GRE) imaging and/or 2D spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI). Similar MRE acquisition parameters, hardware, and reconstruction algorithms were used at each center. Mean stiffness was measured by a single observer for each phantom and acquisition on a single section. Stiffness measurement precision and same-session test-retest repeatability were assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) and the repeatability coefficient (RC), respectively. Results The mean precision represented by the CV was 5.8% (95% CI: 3.8, 7.7) for all phantoms and both sequences combined. For all phantoms, 2D GRE achieved a CV of 4.5% (95% CI: 3.3, 5.7) whereas 2D SE EPI achieved a CV of 7.8% (95% CI: 3.1, 12.6). The mean RC of stiffness measurement was 5.8% (95% CI: 3.7, 7.8) for all phantoms and both sequences combined, 4.9% (95% CI: 2.7, 7.0) for 2D GRE, and 7.0% (95% CI: 2.9, 11.2) for 2D SE EPI (all phantoms). Conclusion MRE had excellent in vitro precision and same-session test-retest repeatability in the multicenter setting when similar imaging protocols, hardware, and reconstruction algorithms were used. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Tang in this issue.