Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous factors are related to the prognosis of rectal cancer, including T stage, N stage, metastasis, extramural venous invasion (EMVI), circumferential resection margin (CRM), and tumor differentiation. However, it is still a challenge to precisely evaluate them before therapy; therefore, we investigate whether synthetic magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values could help predict the prognostic factors of rectal cancer. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients (55 men and 32 women; mean age, 59±11 years) with pathologically confirmed rectal cancer were enrolled. Preoperative quantitative metrics, including T1, T2, proton density (PD), and ADC values, were measured with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquired by a single-shot echo-planar sequence and synthetic magnetic resonance imaging acquired by a multi-dynamic multi-echo sequence at 3.0 T, in patients with rectal cancer by two radiologists. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging using the independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariate logistic regression analyses and compared the area under the ROC curve of quantitative values using the DeLong test. RESULTS: The T2 and PD values showed a significant reduction among patients with poor differentiation and lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. The area under the ROC curve values of T2 and PD values for predicting magnetic resonance imaging N stage and differentiation were 0.734, 0.682, and 0.673, 0.686, respectively. Moreover, combining T2 and PD values for magnetic resonance imaging N stage slightly improved the area under the ROC curve value of 0.774 (95% CI, 0.673-0.876). In the present study, the ADC and T1 values were not significant in the differentiation or clinical stage of rectal cancer (RC). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative T2 and PD values obtained by synthetic magnetic resonance imaging might be used for evaluating prognostic factors of rectal cancer noninvasively. Furthermore, combining T2 and PD values further improved the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging N staging in rectal cancer. The ADC and T1 values were not significant in the differentiation or clinical stage of RC.