Abstract
BACKGROUND: For the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), initial treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy in selected patients is considered one of the recommended options by the main international clinical guidelines. Nonetheless, the administration of all chemotherapy before definitive treatment (total neoadjuvant therapy [TNT]) is an optimal alternative with a growing level of evidence that must be evaluated in multidisciplinary boards. This review summarizes the available data and controversies in this scenario. SUMMARY: We have analyzed the characteristics of the main published studies that assess the use of TNT in patients with LARC, evaluating their inclusion criteria and distinguishing between the employed radiotherapy fractionations, systemic agents, timing, and the implications of these treatments with regard to surgery and long-term oncological results. Our aim was to describe the evidence that supports the use of a specific regime in everyday clinical practice. KEY POINTS: There is solid evidence for the use of TNT in patients with LARC. There are no data indicating the superiority of one specific TNT scheme among all the existing options. International clinical guidelines leave the door open to choose the most adequate treatment based on the clinical and pathological characteristics of each patient. This review shows the different approaches to TNT and assesses the best options based on clinical evidence.