Post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus anti-thymocyte globulin in haploidentical stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

单倍体相合造血干细胞移植后环磷酰胺与抗胸腺细胞球蛋白的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) are mainstay prophylactic treatment options for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), widely used in haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Due to a lack of prospective studies, a number of retrospective comparisons have yielded different conclusions as to which prophylaxis regimen is superior. We performed a meta-analysis of these studies to get more informed and comprehensive decisions from clinicians. Nine studies were eligible, and a total of 1674 patients were included. The combined hazard ratio (HR), relative risk (RR), and weighted mean difference (WMD) results demonstrated that, compared with ATG, PTCy demonstrated better overall survival (OS) (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51-0.97), leukemia-free survival (LFS) (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.81), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97); faster lymphocyte reconstitution, lower risk of relapse (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.9) and fungal infection (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.79). However, neutrophil engraftment was delayed in the PTCy regimen group (WMD 3.29, 95% CI 2.49-4.10). No statistically significant differences were observed in the time to platelet engraftment, bacterial infection, or viral infection, including cytomegalovirus, polyomaviruses BK/JC and Epstein-Barr virus. Nor was any statistically significant difference observed in the incidences of II-IV acute-GVHD (aGVHD) (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.62-1.05), III-IV aGVHD (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.22-2.19) or severe chronic-GVHD (cGVHD) (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.51-2.88), or non-relapse mortality (NRM) outcomes (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.4-1.11). Therefore, in haploidentical transplantation, PTCy accelerates lymphocyte reconstitution, significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and fungal infection, and improves the OS, LFS and GRFS, compared with ATG, with no significant difference in the efficacy of preventing acute or severe cGVHD, or the risk of bacterial or viral infection.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。