Abstract
Objective Cuff leak test is an effective and established maneuver to predict airway edema. Standard fluid therapy (SFT) based on conventional monitoring is often associated with postoperative airway edema after complex spine surgeries. We conducted this prospective randomized controlled study to compare the effect of SFT versus goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on the cuff leak gradient (CLG) in patients undergoing complex spine surgery in prone position. Our secondary objectives were to compare the effect of SFT and GDFT on sore throat, hoarseness, and length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay. Materials and Methods Thirty consecutive American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients (18-60 years), of either sex, scheduled for spine surgery in prone position with expected duration of surgery more than 5 hours were included. The patients were randomized into two groups of 15 each. Group S patients ( n = 15) served as control group and received SFT intraoperatively, while patients in group G ( n = 15) received GDFT. Standard anesthetic protocol was followed in both the groups. The CLG was defined as the difference between the cuff leak volume (CLV) after intubation (CLV (AI) ) and before extubation (CLV (BE) ). Statistical Analysis and Results CLG was significantly less in group G (group S, 137.12 mL; group G, 65.52 mL; p -value <0.001). Intravenous fluids, blood loss, and postoperative sore throat were comparatively lesser in group G, though not statistically significant. Postoperative hoarseness was significantly lower in group G ( p -value = 0.003). Duration of ICU stay in group G (19.43 hours) was significantly lower ( p -value = 0.009) than group S (24.64 hours), but length of hospital stay was comparable. Conclusion GDFT significantly reduces airway edema and consequently reduces CLG as compared with SFT in patients undergoing complex spine surgery in prone position. Postoperatively, it also reduces sore throat, hoarseness of voice, and duration of ICU stay.