Case study on the evaluation of skin sensitization for 23 selected fragrance ingredients using a defined approach based on OECD Guideline 497

本案例研究采用基于经合组织第497号指南的特定方法,对23种选定的香料成分进行皮肤致敏性评估。

阅读:1

Abstract

Twenty-three single-ingredient substances, selected from materials labeled as allergens in cosmetic fragrances, were assessed for skin sensitization potential using a defined approach (DA) based on the OECD Guideline 497 Integrated Testing Strategy version 2 (ITSv2). According to the ITSv2, skin hypersensitivity data for these selected substances were integrated. In chemico data (from the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay, DPRA) and in vitro data (from the human Cell Line Activation Test, h-CLAT) were obtained from existing databases, while in silico data were generated via the automated workflow of the OECD QSAR Toolbox. The DA for skin sensitization, which combines QSAR predictions with DPRA and h-CLAT test results, categorized 17 substances, including 2-benzylideneheptanal, as "Sensitizers"; 5 substances, including 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, as "Inconclusive"; and citronellol alone was categorized as "Not Classified." The outcomes from the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for substances identified as skin sensitizers by the DA method demonstrated similar classification patterns to those from DA. These results underscore the necessity of integrating comprehensive in vitro, in chemico, and in silico data for accurate evaluation of potential skin sensitizers. This case study could aid in enhancing the safety assessments of potential skin sensitizers using DA; however, final categorization is subject to validation by regulatory authorities.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。