Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence assisted clinical imaging in the detection of oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

人工智能辅助临床影像在口腔潜在恶性疾病和口腔癌检测中的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to examine the application of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in detecting oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) and oral cancerous lesions, and to evaluate the accuracy variations among different imaging tools employed in these diagnostic processes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in four databases: Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria included studies using machine learning algorithms to provide diagnostic information on specific oral lesions, prospective or retrospective design, and inclusion of OPMD. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were also required. Forest plots were generated to display overall diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to examine potential differences among different imaging tools. RESULTS: The overall DOR for AI-based screening of OPMD and oral mucosal cancerous lesions from normal mucosa was 68.438 (95% CI= [39.484-118.623], I2 =86%). The area under the SROC curve was 0.938, indicating excellent diagnostic performance. AI-assisted screening showed a sensitivity of 89.9% (95% CI= [0.866-0.925]; I2 =81%), specificity of 89.2% (95% CI= [0.851-0.922], I2 =79%), and a high negative predictive value of 89.5% (95% CI= [0.851-0.927], I2 =96%). Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant difference among the three image tools. After generating a GOSH plot, the DOR was calculated to be 49.30, and the area under the SROC curve was 0.877. Additionally, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were 90.5% (95% CI [0.873-0.929], I2 =4%), 87.0% (95% CI [0.813-0.912], I2 =49%) and 90.1% (95% CI [0.860-0.931], I2 =57%), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that clinical photography had the highest diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: AI-based detection using clinical photography shows a high DOR and is easily accessible in the current era with billions of phone subscribers globally. This indicates that there is significant potential for AI to enhance the diagnostic capabilities of general practitioners to the level of specialists by utilizing clinical photographs, without the need for expensive specialized imaging equipment.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。