An international randomized study with long-term follow-up of single versus combination chemotherapy of multibacillary leprosy

一项国际随机对照研究,对多菌型麻风病的单药化疗与联合化疗进行了长期随访。

阅读:1

Abstract

A total of 307 patients with lepromatous leprosy and borderline lepromatous leprosy were randomized to dapsone monotherapy or to one of two types of drug combinations. A 3-year treatment phase was followed by a 5-year observation phase. The evaluation included 233 patients for whom together there were 1,404 years of observation. A total of 1,956 blinded histopathological specimens were processed centrally. When entering the trial isolates from 13 patients (5.6%) showed dapsone resistance in the mouse footpad test, and these patients were evaluated separately. Dapsone monotherapy (68 patients) had the same frequency of cure as the combination of dapsone and rifampin (77 patients) or the four-drug regimen consisting of dapsone, rifampin, isoniazid, and prothionamide (75 patients). We did not find a significant difference in the clearance of bacteria either between the monotherapy and the two-drug combination or the monotherapy and the four-drug combination. Six months after the initiation of treatment, disease in 15% of the patients who received dapsone monotherapy but none of the patients who received combined treatment were clinically progressive. After another 1 to 9 months of treatment the disease in all patients was stable or regressive. There was no difference in the type or frequency of reactions. Only after the end of the scheduled observation phase three relapses were reported. All three treatment regimens well tolerated. Dapsone monotherapy is highly effective in the treatment of multibacillary leprosy under the conditions of well-controlled treatment. Combination regimens seem only to accelerate the regression of the active disease when they are compared with monotherapy with dapsone. The mouse footpad test does not reflect the clinical resistance and cannot be recommended for use in making therapeutic decisions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。