A comparative study of target volumes based on (18)F-FDG PET-CT and ten phases of 4DCT for primary thoracic squamous esophageal cancer

一项基于 (18)F-FDG PET-CT 和 4DCT 十个相位对原发性胸段食管鳞状细胞癌靶区体积的比较研究

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlations in target volumes based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and four-dimensional CT (4DCT) to detect the feasibility of implementing PET in determining gross target volumes (GTV) for tumor motion for primary thoracic esophageal cancer (EC). METHODS: Thirty-three patients with EC sequentially underwent contrast-enhanced 3DCT, 4DCT, and (18)F-FDG PET-CT thoracic simulation. The internal gross target volume (IGTV)(10) was obtained by combining the GTV from ten phases of 4DCT. The GTVs based on PET/CT images were defined by setting of different standardized uptake value thresholds and visual contouring. The difference in volume ratio, conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI) between IGTV(10) and GTV(PET) was compared. RESULTS: The images from 20 patients were suitable for further analysis. The optimal volume ratio of 0.95±0.32, 1.06±0.50, 1.07±0.49 was at standardized uptake value (SUV)(2.5), SUV(20%), or manual contouring. The mean CIs were from 0.33 to 0.54. The best CIs were at SUV(2.0) (0.51±0.11), SUV(2.5) (0.53±0.13), SUV(20%) (0.53±0.12), and manual contouring (0.54±0.14). The mean DIs of GTV(PET) in IGTV(10) were from 0.60 to 0.90, and the mean DIs of IGTV(10) in GTV(PET) ranged from 0.35 to 0.78. A negative correlation was found between the mean CI and different SUV (P=0.000). CONCLUSION: None of the PET-based contours had both close spatial and volumetric approximation to the 4DCT IGTV(10). Further evaluation and optimization of PET as a tool for target identification are required.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。