Abstract
The corrosive anions (e.g., Cl(-)) have been recognized as the origins to cause severe corrosion of anode during seawater electrolysis, while in experiments it is found that natural seawater (~0.41 M Cl(-)) is usually more corrosive than simulated seawater (~0.5 M Cl(-)). Here we elucidate that besides Cl(-), Br(-) in seawater is even more harmful to Ni-based anodes because of the inferior corrosion resistance and faster corrosion kinetics in bromide than in chloride. Experimental and simulated results reveal that Cl(-) corrodes locally to form narrow-deep pits while Br(-) etches extensively to generate shallow-wide pits, which can be attributed to the fast diffusion kinetics of Cl(-) and the lower reaction energy of Br(-) in the passivation layer. Additionally, for the Ni-based electrodes with catalysts (e.g., NiFe-LDH) loading on the surface, Br(-) causes extensive spalling of the catalyst layer, resulting in rapid performance degradation. This work clearly points out that, in addition to anti-Cl(-) corrosion, designing anti-Br(-) corrosion anodes is even more crucial for future application of seawater electrolysis.