Abstract
It is widely accepted that the corrosion resistance of stainless steel originates from a compact Cr(2)O(3) layer in the native passive film that serves as a barrier to aggressive ions. However, this suggestion has been questioned by some researchers. They believe that protectiveness might be related to the film recovery. Herein, the pitting development of bare 316 L stainless steel was compared with a corrosion-resistance enhanced steel obtained by tuning the native passive film of the alloy. Statistical software was employed for tracing the size and number of pits on the alloy surface. The statistical results for 12 weeks in 1 M sodium chloride solution (80 °C) revealed that there was a crossover in the growing rates of stable pits (diameter > 9 µm) between the bare alloy and the film-enhanced one. Stable pits on bare 316 L occurred early but showed a comparatively slow increase in the following weeks, demonstrating that self-repairability of metastable pits rather than impermeability of the native passive film plays the key role in the early stage of pitting corrosion.