Abstract
Amino acid frequencies in proteins may not be at equilibrium. We consider two possible explanations for the nonzero net residue fluxes in drosophilid proteins. First, protein interiors may have a suboptimal residue composition and be under a selective pressure favoring stability, that is, leading to the loss of polar (and the gain of large) amino acids. One would then expect stronger net fluxes on the protein interior than at the exposed sites. Alternatively, if most of the polarity loss occurs at the exposed sites and the selective constraint on amino acid composition at such sites decreases over time, net loss of polarity may be neutral and caused by disproportionally high occurrence of polar residues at exposed, least constrained sites. We estimated net evolutionary fluxes of residue polarity and volume at sites with different solvent accessibility in conserved protein families from 12 species of Drosophila. Net loss of polarity, miniscule in magnitude, but consistent across all lineages, occurred at all sites except the most exposed ones, where net flux of polarity was close to zero or, in membrane proteins, even positive. At the intermediate solvent accessibility the net fluxes of polarity and volume were similar to neutral predictions, whereas much of the polarity loss not attributable to neutral expectations occurred at the buried sites. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that residue composition in many proteins is structurally suboptimal and continues to evolve toward lower polarity in the protein interior, in particular in proteins with intracellular localization. The magnitude of polarity and volume changes was independent from the protein's evolutionary age, indicating that the approach to equilibrium has been slow or that no such single equilibrium exists.