Respective Effects of Helmet Pressure Support, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, and Nasal High-Flow in Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial

头盔压力支撑、持续气道正压通气和鼻高流量通气对低氧性呼吸衰竭的各自疗效:一项随机交叉临床试验

阅读:1

Abstract

Rationale: The respective effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and pressure support delivered through the helmet interface in patients with hypoxemia need to be better understood. Objectives: To assess the respective effects of helmet pressure support (noninvasive ventilation [NIV]) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) on effort to breathe, lung inflation, and gas exchange in patients with hypoxemia (Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)) ⩽ 200). Methods: Fifteen patients underwent 1-hour phases (constant Fi(O(2))) of HFNO (60 L/min), helmet NIV (PEEP = 14 cm H(2)O, pressure support = 12 cm H(2)O), and CPAP (PEEP = 14 cm H(2)O) in randomized sequence. Measurements and Main Results: Inspiratory esophageal (ΔP(ES)) and transpulmonary pressure (ΔP(L)) swings were used as surrogates for inspiratory effort and lung distension, respectively. Tidal Volume (Vt) and end-expiratory lung volume were assessed with electrical impedance tomography. ΔP(ES) was lower during NIV versus CPAP and HFNO (median [interquartile range], 5 [3-9] cm H(2)O vs. 13 [10-19] cm H(2)O vs. 10 [8-13] cm H(2)O; P = 0.001 and P = 0.01). ΔP(L) was not statistically different between treatments. Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)) ratio was significantly higher during NIV and CPAP versus HFNO (166 [136-215] and 175 [158-281] vs. 120 [107-149]; P = 0.002 and P = 0.001). NIV and CPAP similarly increased Vt versus HFNO (mean change, 70% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17-122%], P = 0.02; 93% [95% CI, 30-155%], P = 0.002) and end-expiratory lung volume (mean change, 198% [95% CI, 67-330%], P = 0.001; 263% [95% CI, 121-407%], P = 0.001), mostly due to increased aeration/ventilation in dorsal lung regions. During HFNO, 14 of 15 patients had pendelluft involving >10% of Vt; pendelluft was mitigated by CPAP and further by NIV. Conclusions: Compared with HFNO, helmet NIV, but not CPAP, reduced ΔP(ES). CPAP and NIV similarly increased oxygenation, end-expiratory lung volume, and Vt, without affecting ΔP(L). NIV, and to a lesser extent CPAP, mitigated pendelluft. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04241861).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。