Why the recent ACIP recommendations regarding conjugate pneumococcal vaccine in adults may be irrelevant

为什么ACIP近期关于成人接种肺炎球菌结合疫苗的建议可能已经过时

阅读:1

Abstract

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the US Centers for Disease Control (ACIP) has recently recommended the 13-valent protein-conjugate pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13) for routine use in adults age 18-65 who have immunocompromising conditions as well as in all adults over the age of 65. By comparison to 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), antibody responses to PCV13 are similar or modestly better one month after vaccination. The implication that PCV13 will provide more persistent immunity has been disproven; 12 months later, recipients of PPSV23 or PCV13 have identical anti-pneumococcal activity. The theoretical concept that a protein-based vaccine will be followed by a booster effect when pure polysaccharide antigens are administered is based on remarkably little evidence. The strongest objection to the current recommendations is that, since PCVs stimulate mucosal antibodies, the widespread use of these PCVs has led to a near-disappearance of vaccine serotypes from the population. This phenomenon has been amply documented for PCV7, and PCV13 is well on its way to doing the same. Thus, as US physicians are convincing their adult patients to receive 2 "pneumonia shots" instead of one, the use of PCV13 in the USA is rapidly becoming irrelevant.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。