Abstract
BACKGROUND: Imbalanced datasets pose significant challenges in predictive modeling, leading to biased outcomes and reduced model reliability. This study addresses data imbalance in diabetes prediction using machine learning techniques. Utilizing data from the Fasa Adult Cohort Study (FACS) with a 5-year follow-up of 10,000 participants, we developed predictive models for Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We employed various data-level and algorithm-level interventions, including SMOTE, ADASYN, SMOTEENN, Random Over Sampling and KMeansSMOTE, paired with Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) classifier. We evaluated model performance using F1 score, AUC, and G-means-metrics chosen to provide a comprehensive assessment of model accuracy, discrimination ability, and overall balance in performance, particularly in the context of imbalanced datasets. RESULTS: our study uncovered key factors influencing diabetes risk and evaluated the performance of various machine learning models. Feature importance analysis revealed that the most influential predictors of diabetes differ between males and females. For females, the most important factors are triglyceride (TG), basal metabolic rate (BMR), and total cholesterol (CHOL), whereas for males, the key predictors are body Mass Index (BMI), serum glutamate Oxaloacetate Transaminase (SGOT), and Gamma-Glutamyl (GGT). Across the entire dataset, BMI remains the most important variable, followed by SGOT, BMR, and energy intake. These insights suggest that gender-specific risk profiles should be considered in diabetes prevention and management strategies. In terms of model performance, our results show that ADASYN with MLP classifier achieved an F1 score of 82.17 ± 3.38, AUC of 89.61 ± 2.09, and G-means of 89.15 ± 2.31. SMOTE with MLP followed closely with an F1 score of 79.85 ± 3.91, AUC of 89.7 ± 2.54, and G-means of 89.31 ± 2.78. The SMOTEENN with Random Forest combination achieved an F1 score of 78.27 ± 1.54, AUC of 87.18 ± 1.12, and G-means of 86.47 ± 1.28. CONCLUSION: These combinations effectively address class imbalance, improving the accuracy and reliability of diabetes predictions. The findings highlight the importance of using appropriate data-balancing techniques in medical data analysis.