Comparing Emotionally Focused Therapy vs Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Anxiety, Life Quality in CAD Patients During COVID-19

比较情绪聚焦疗法与经颅直流电刺激对新冠肺炎患者焦虑和生活质量的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased psychological distress and impacted the diagnosis and treatment of noncommunicable diseases. This study aimed to examine the comparative effectiveness of emotionally focused therapy (EFT) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the anxiety and quality of life (QoL) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A total of 45 participants who met the criteria for a current episode of CAD, referred to Shahid-Rajaee Heart Hospital in Tehran City, Iran, were chosen by convenience sampling method. They were randomly assigned to a 9-week/60-minute EFT (n=15) group therapy, a 5-week/20-minute tDCS (n=15) experimental group, and one control group (n=15). They were assessed at pre-test, post-test, and 3-month follow-up. The study subjects completed the self-reported reliable and valid Persian version of questionnaires, Beck anxiety inventory (BAI), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Then, repeated measures analysis of variance was used to measure inferential statistics. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in anxiety and QoL scores in both EFT and tDCS groups over the post-test and follow-up period (P≤0.01). However, a difference was found when EFT had a greater effect on the anxiety and QoL. CONCLUSION: These results showed that EFT and tDCS have effective interventions in reducing anxiety and improving the QoL of CAD patients, but improvements with EFT were greater than those with tDCS.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。