Differences in trauma-informed care implementation by clinic-level factors across Ryan White HIV clinics in the Southeastern United States

美国东南部瑞安·怀特艾滋病诊所中,创伤知情护理实施情况因诊所层面因素而异

阅读:1

Abstract

Trauma is common among people with HIV (PWH) and associated with low HIV care engagement, thus trauma-informed care (TIC) integration within HIV services is critical. From December 2019 to April 2020, we conducted surveys with 321 administrators, providers, and staff of 46 Ryan White HIV clinics (RWCs) in 8 Southeastern U.S. states to assess level of TIC implementation and clinic-level factors associated with TIC adoption. The mean score for TIC implementation was highest for the Physical Environment domain (μ = 4.08, SE = 0.07), followed by Screening, Assessment, and Treatment Services (μ = 3.96, SE = 0.07), Cross-sector Collaboration (μ = 3.75, SE = 0.08), Engagement and Involvement (μ = 3.92, SE = 0.09); and Training and Workforce Development (μ = 3.54, SE = 0.12). Greatest gaps were in staff TIC training, staff support, presence of onsite legal, spiritual, and housing services, and seeking patients' definitions of safety and developing their individualized crisis/safety plans. Across most TIC implementation domains, clinic type, urbanicity, academic affiliation, and presence of onsite psychosocial support services were associated with level of TIC adoption. Thus, RWCs have the necessary foundation to integrate TIC practices, but further progress will require addressing identified gaps. The overall lack of significant difference in TIC implementation across domains by clinic-level factors suggests that a RW network-wide approach to enhancing TIC integration is feasible.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。