Effects of a Rehabilitation Programme Using a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device in COPD

使用鼻吸气限制装置进行康复计划对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients are characterised for presenting dyspnea, which reduces their physical capacity and tolerance to physical exercise. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of adding a Feel-Breathe (FB) device for inspiratory muscle training (IMT) to an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Twenty patients were randomised into three groups: breathing with FB (FBG), oronasal breathing without FB (ONBG) and control group (CG). FBG and ONBG carried out the same training programme with resistance, strength and respiratory exercises for 8 weeks. CG did not perform any pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Regarding intra group differences in the value obtained in the post-training test at the time when the maximum value in the pre-training test was obtained (Post(PRE)), FBG obtained lower values in oxygen consumption (VO(2), mean = -435.6 mL/min, Bayes Factor (BF(10)) > 100), minute ventilation (VE, -8.5 L/min, BF(10) = 25), respiratory rate (RR, -3.3 breaths/min, BF(10) = 2), heart rate (HR, -13.7 beats/min, BF(10) > 100) and carbon dioxide production (VCO(2), -183.0 L/min, BF(10) = 50), and a greater value in expiratory time (Tex, 0.22 s, BF(10) = 12.5). At the maximum value recorded in the post-training test (Post(FINAL)), FBG showed higher values in the total time of the test (T(t), 4.3 min, BF(10) = 50) and respiratory exchange rate (RER, 0.05, BF(10) = 1.3). Regarding inter group differences at Pre(POST), FBG obtained a greater negative increment than ONBG in the ventilatory equivalent of CO(2) (EqCO(2), -3.8 L/min, BF(10) = 1.1) and compared to CG in VE (-8.3 L/min, BF(10) = 3.6), VCO(2) (-215.9 L/min, BF(10) = 3.0), EqCO2 (-3.7 L/min, BF(10) = 1.1) and HR (-12.9 beats/min, BF(10) = 3.4). FBG also showed a greater Pre(POST) positive increment in Tex (0.21 s, BF(10) = 1.4) with respect to CG. At Pre(FINAL), FBG presented a greater positive increment compared to CG in T(t) (4.4 min, BF(10) = 3.2) and negative in VE/VCO(2) intercept (-4.7, BF(10) = 1.1). The use of FB added to a pulmonary rehabilitation programme in COPD patients could improve tolerance in the incremental exercise test and energy efficiency. However, there is only a statically significant difference between FBG and ONBG in EqCO(2). Therefore, more studies are necessary to reach a definitive conclusion about including FB in a pulmonary rehabilitation programme.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。