Abstract
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays are the gold standard for diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP). However, they are laborious and require skilled personnel. Therefore, execution outside regular working hours of the molecular biology laboratory is limited. The eazyplex P. jirovecii assay (PJA) uses loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detection of P. jirovecii It is performed directly with respiratory specimens, without the need for special skills, and delivers a result within 3 to 25 min. The goal of our study was to compare the performance of the eazyplex PJA with that of established P. jirovecii qPCR assays. All archived bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples that had previously tested positive for P. jirovecii by qPCR assay and 50 control samples (retrospective part), as well as all BALF samples received for P. jirovecii analysis over a period of 4 months (prospective part), were tested. Forty-nine patients with proven PCP and 126 patients without PCP were included. The sensitivity and specificity of the eazyplex PJA (95.7% and 96.5%, respectively) were comparable to those for three different P. jirovecii qPCR assays. The detection limit of the eazyplex PJA was analogous to 10(3) copies of the major surface glycoprotein gene per 25 μl of BALF, corresponding to 10 to 20 P. jirovecii cells. The eazyplex PJA reliably discriminated patients with PCP from patients with P. jirovecii colonization. It delivered a positive result within a mean of 9 min 38 s and required a hands-on time of 2 min 45 s. In summary, the eazyplex PJA showed identical performance for the diagnosis of PCP, compared to qPCR assays. However, in terms of time to result, practicability, and robustness, the eazyplex PJA is clearly superior and allows for around-the-clock molecular testing.