Abstract
Adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) after malaria treatment remains challenging to assess in settings of malaria nonendemicity. Biological evaluation of parasitological clearance relies on microscopic investigation of thick blood smears, which is a specific technique that not all diagnosis laboratories are able to perform. Rapid diagnosis tests (RDTs) and molecular biology techniques are proposed as alternatives to microscope conventional techniques; however, their performance for treatment efficacy evaluation is controversial. We present here a retrospective comparative study for RDT and PCR (nested and high-resolution-melting quantitative PCR [HRM-qPCR]) evaluation of ACPR in a nonendemicity context. Blood samples from 133 patients presenting a Plasmodium falciparum monoinfection were included. Samples obtained at the time of diagnosis and at 3, 7, and 28 days after diagnosis were investigated. Histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP-2)-based RDT results remained positive in 51% of cases 28 days after diagnosis and appropriate therapeutic management. Parasite DNA was detected by the two PCR techniques (nested PCR and HRM-qPCR) in 12% and 10% of samples 28 days after treatment initiation, respectively. No therapeutic failure was recorded in the studied patients. Persistence of positive signal might reflect the presence of circulating asexual parasites or persistence of HRP-2 and parasitic DNA in patient's peripheral blood after parasitic clearance.