Abstract
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), a cause of food-borne colitis and hemolytic-uremic syndrome in children, can be serotype O157:H7 (O157) or other serotypes (non-O157). E. coli O157 can be detected by culture with sorbitol-MacConkey agar (SMAC), but non-O157 STEC cannot be detected with this medium. Both O157 and non-O157 STEC can be detected by immunoassay for Shiga toxins 1 and 2. The objectives of this study were first to compare the diagnostic utility of SMAC to that of the Premier EHEC enzyme immunoassay (Meridian Diagnostics) for detection of STEC in children and second to compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics of children with serotype O157:H7 STEC and non-O157:H7 STEC infections. Stool samples submitted for testing for STEC between April 2004 and September 2009 were tested by both SMAC culture and the Premier EHEC assay at Children's Hospital Boston. Samples positive by either test were sent for confirmatory testing and serotyping at the Hinton State Laboratory Institute (HSLI). Chart review was performed on children with confirmed STEC infection. Of 5,110 children tested for STEC, 50 (0.9%) had STEC infection confirmed by culture; 33 were O157:H7 and 17 were non-O157:H7. The Premier EHEC assay and SMAC culture detected 96.0% and 58.0% of culture-confirmed STEC isolates (any serotype), respectively, and 93.9% and 87.9% of STEC O157:H7 isolates, respectively. There were no significant differences in disease severity or laboratory manifestations of STEC infection between children with O157:H7 and those with non-O157 STEC. The Premier EHEC assay was significantly more sensitive than SMAC culture for diagnosis of STEC, and O157:H7 and non-O157:H7 STEC caused infections of similar severity in children.