Comparison of safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatments for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: results from a single center

单中心研究比较不同血管内治疗方法治疗症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的安全性和有效性

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) is one of the common causes of ischemic stroke. However, the treatment of sICAS has remained a challenge in the past with unfavorable findings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different endovascular treatment methods for sICAS. METHODS: The study involved 154 patients with sICAS who received endovascular treatment at Qingdao University Hospital between January 2021 and October 2023. Based on the characteristics of the lesions, three different types of treatments were performed: bare metal stent group (BMS group), drug-coated balloon group (DCB group), and drug-eluting stent group (DES group). The primary endpoints included the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the 6-month, periprocedural complications, the rate of stroke recurrence in the area of the stented artery during the follow-up period, and modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge, at 1-month, at 3-month, at 6-month of patients after stenting. RESULTS: The incidence of perioperative complications did not differ significantly between groups (11.3% in the BMS group, 8.0% in the DCB group, and 6.1% in the DES group, p = 0.776). All patients (154/154) had successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment. The incidence of stroke during follow-up was 4.5% (7/154), with 5 (7.0%) patients in the BMS group, 1 (2.0%) patient in the DCB group, and 1 (3.0%) patient in the DES group. The restenosis rate in the BMS group [35.2% (25/71)] tended to be higher than that in the DCB group [6.0% (3/50)] and DES group [9.1% (3/33)]. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, endovascular treatment strategy and vessel distribution were significant independent risk factors for ISR within 6 months (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Adverse events and success rates following stent implantation are comparable across therapy groups in individuals with sICAS. When compared to BMS, DES, and DCB reduce the risk of ISR, with the advantages of the DCB appearing to be greater for some high-risk patients with ICAS.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。