Comparison of gene disruption induced by cytosine base editing-mediated iSTOP with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated frameshift

胞嘧啶碱基编辑介导的 iSTOP 与 CRISPR/Cas9 介导的移码引起的基因破坏的比较

阅读:5
作者:Lu Dang, Guanglei Li, Xinjie Wang, Shisheng Huang, Yu Zhang, Yuanxin Miao, Lisi Zeng, Shuzhong Cui, Xingxu Huang

Conclusions

Our results reveal the differences between the two gene knockout strategies and provide useful information for choosing the appropriate gene disruption strategy.

Methods

Here, we selected some sgRNAs with different position background, then HEK293T cells were transfected with CBE/Cas9 plasmids together with sgRNAs. GFP-positive cells were harvested by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) 48 hours after transfection. Genomic DNA was collected for deep sequencing to analyse editing efficiency and genotype. RNA and protein were extracted to analyse gene mRNA level using qPCR analysis and Western blot.

Results

Here, we compared the gene disruption by CBE-mediated iSTOP with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated frameshift. We found BE-mediated gene knockout yielded fewer genotypes. BE-mediated gene editing precisely achieved silencing of two neighbouring genes, while CRISPR/Cas9 may delete the large fragment between two target sites. All of three stop codons could efficiently disrupt the target genes. It is worth notifying, Cas9-mediated gene knockout showed a more impact on neighbouring genes mRNA level than the BE editor. Conclusions: Our results reveal the differences between the two gene knockout strategies and provide useful information for choosing the appropriate gene disruption strategy.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。