Abstract
Harvesting donor site explants for split-thickness skin grafting creates an iatrogenic wound that presents additional challenges to clinicians due to morbidities such as persistent bleeding, pain, infection, and delayed epithelialization. Although there have been several randomized controlled trials to compare wound dressing effectiveness, there is still a lack of standardization for donor site wound dressings. A retrospective comparison of 59 patients that underwent split-thickness skin graft reconstructions between January 2017 and September 2018 was performed. Donor sites of Group 1 patients (n = 29) were treated with a transparent film dressing and transitioned to petrolatum gauze dressings if exudate management became problematic; Group 2 patients (n = 30) were treated with oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen/silver-oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC/C/Ag-ORC) dressings. Evaluations of time to epithelialization, number of dressings required, signs of inflammation, and objective pain were compared between groups. Group 1 was comprised of 18 female and 11 male patients, whereas Group 2 was comprised of 14 females and 16 males. There were no significant differences between groups when comparing age, sex, comorbidities, or donor site size (area or depth). Patients in Group 2 had a significantly shorter time to complete re-epithelialization (P < .0001), fewer dressing changes (P < .0001), and less objective pain as measured by the need for opioid pain mediation (P < .0001) when compared to Group 1. The percentage of patients with signs of inflammation was also lower for Group 2, although this difference was not statistically significant (P = .0797). Although prospective, controlled studies are still needed, data from this study suggest that ORC/C/Ag-ORC dressings could become a more effective alternative for the management of donor site wounds, especially in patients with known risk factors for wound healing.