Comparison of the efficacy and safety of low-dose calcineurin inhibitors plus sirolimus plus mycophenolic acid with the standard-dose calcineurin inhibitors plus mycophenolic acid regimen in patients who received kidney transplants

比较低剂量钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂联合西罗莫司和霉酚酸与标准剂量钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂联合霉酚酸方案在肾移植患者中的疗效和安全性

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (SRL) has shown its anti-rejection and renoprotective efficacy in patients with kidney transplantation. However, more evidence is still needed. The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an SRL-containing regimen in patients who received kidney transplants. METHODS: Fifty patients with end-stage renal disease who received kidney transplants were enrolled and divided into the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) + mycophenolic acid (MPA)+ glucocorticoid (N = 22) and CNI + MPA + SRL + glucocorticoid groups (N = 28) according to the actual regimen that they received. The minimal plasma concentration of tacrolimus and cyclosporin was maintained at 6-10 ng/mL and 150-250 ng/mL in the CNI + MPA + glucocorticoid group and 4-6 ng/mL and 75-125 ng/mL in the CNI + MPA + SRL + glucocorticoid group. The minimal plasma concentration of SRL was maintained at 5-8 ng/mL. RESULTS: The Cr at month (M)6, M12, and uric acid at M3 were lower, while the eGFR at M12 was higher in the CNI + MPA + SRL + glucocorticoid group compared with the CNI + MPA + glucocorticoid group (all P < 0.05). The acute rejection rate showed a lower trend in the CNI + MPA + SRL + glucocorticoid group compared with the CNI + MPA + glucocorticoid group without statistical significance. The urine BK virus at M3, M6, M9, and M12 was lower in the CNI + MPA + SRL + glucocorticoid group compared with the CNI + MPA + glucocorticoid group (all P < 0.05). Incidence of most adverse events was similar between groups, except that BK virus was lower in the CNI + MPA + SRL + glucocorticoid group compared with the CNI + MPA + glucocorticoid group (0.0% vs. 36.4%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Low-dose CNI combined with SRL regimen as the initial anti-rejection regimen indicates a comparable anti-rejection and better renoprotective efficacy with a satisfying safety profile compared with the standard regimen.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。