Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Histoplasma urine antigen (HUAg) is the preferred method to diagnose progressive disseminated histoplasmosis (PDH) in HIV patients. In 2007, IMMY ALPHA Histoplasma EIA was approved for clinical for on-site use, and therefore useful for regions outside the United States. However, ALPHA-HUAg is considered inferior to the MVista-HUAg which is only available on referral. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ALPHA-HUAg. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, diagnostic test study in two secondary and eight tertiary-care facilities in Mexico. We included HIV patient with PDH suspicion and evaluated ALPHA-HUAg diagnostic accuracy using as reference standard the Histoplasma capsulatum growth on blood, bone marrow, and tissue cultures or compatible histopathologic exam (PDH-proven). We evaluated the results of 288 patients, 29.5% (85/288; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.3-35.1) had PDH. The sensitivity of ALPHA-HUAg was 67.1% (95% CI, 56-76.8%) and the specificity was 97.5% (95% CI, 94.3%-99.1%). The positive likelihood ratio was 27.2 (95% CI; 11.6-74.4). In 10.5% of the PDH-proven patients, a co-existing opportunistic infection was diagnosed, mostly disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We observed a high specificity but low sensitivity of IMMY-HUAg. The test may be useful to start early antifungals, but a culture-based approach is necessary since co-infections are frequent and a negative IMMY-HUAg result does not rule out PDH.