Comparison of the efficacy of different treatments after non-curative endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

比较不同治疗方法在非根治性内镜切除浅表食管癌后的疗效:一项荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy of different treatments after non-curative endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: Databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched from inception to November 25, 2025. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.3, with Stata version 15 employed for supplementary statistical assessments. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies involving 1,304 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the recurrence rate after non-curative endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal carcinoma was significantly higher in the observation group than in the adjuvant treatment group (OR = 3.25, 95% CI: 1.88-5.62, P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the chemoradiotherapy group and the surgery group (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.23-1.84, P = 0.42). Patients with lymphovascular invasion had a higher recurrence rate, which was statistically significant (OR = 4.01, 95% CI: 1.48-10.84, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Lymphovascular invasion is a risk factor for recurrence in patients. The adjuvant treatment group shows significantly reduced recurrence rates compared to the observation group, with no significant difference in recurrence rates between surgical and chemoradiotherapeutic approaches. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251108299.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。