Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted surgery in the treatment of children with Hirschsprung's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗儿童先天性巨结肠的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to systematically evaluate the differences between robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) and laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) in intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and prognostic outcomes for children with Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR). By conducting a meta-analysis, evidence-based insights for clinical practice were sought. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to May 10, 2025, to identify comparative studies of RAS and LAS for HSCR. Two reviewers independently screened literature and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RevMan5.4 and STATA18 were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with heterogeneity and publication bias evaluated. RESULTS: Six studies involving 789 children (352 RAS, 437 LAS) were included. Meta-analysis showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss in the RAS group (OR = -6.45, 95%CI: -11.77 to -1.14, P = 0.02) but longer operative duration (OR = 19.74, 95%CI: 1.75-37.72, P = 0.03). No significant group differences were found in postoperative enterocolitis (OR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.43-1.01, P = 0.06), anastomotic complications (OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.35-1.45, P = 0.35), soiling (OR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.39-1.60, P = 0.51), adhesive intestinal obstruction (OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 0.22-11.32, P = 0.66), wound infection (OR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.19-3.01, P = 0.70), incisional hernia (OR = 1.13, 95%CI: 0.20-6.40, P = 0.89), perianal infection (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.40-1.23, P = 0.22), urinary retention (OR = 0.23, 95%CI: 0.01-3.59, P = 0.29), or gastrointestinal function recovery time (OR = -1.27, 95%CI: -3.70-1.15, P = 0.30). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RAS group (OR = -0.39, 95%CI: -0.69--0.10, P = 0.009). Egger's test and funnel plot analysis indicated no significant publication bias (P = 0.987). CONCLUSIONS: RAS confers advantages in reducing intraoperative blood loss and shortening hospital stay, although it is associated with a longer operative duration. However, no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications was noted between RAS and LAS, a finding potentially attributable to the limited sample size. Furthermore, the currently elevated treatment cost of RAS may impede its widespread adoption due to economic limitations. Consequently, large-sample, multicenter randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up periods are warranted to validate long-term outcomes and conduct in-depth investigations into cost-effectiveness. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251051595.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。