Abstract
The article by Wu et al highlights the growing incidence of esophageal tumor patients, particularly in China, where the high frequency and death rate are significant problems. The article also examined the impact of health insurance on treatment availability and patient outcomes, demonstrating that the type of insurance can affect the financial burden on patients. This study investigates the effects of different types of health care coverage, namely Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance vs Urban-Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance, and the personal spending ratio on treatment decisions and survival outcomes. The database used is derived from esophageal tumor patient continuation from Chongqing University Hospital in China. A total of 2543 patients were included in the study, allowing for the formation of research cohorts. Patient information included demographic characteristics. The study followed various processes to maintain consistency, including data sources, inclusion and exclusion criteria, follow-up duration, health insurance, and statistical analysis. The average age at diagnosis ranged from 57-74 years, and predominantly included men, married people, and those of Han ethnic background, comprising 2088 and 2519 individuals, respectively. Upon controlling for age, sex, relationship status, country of origin, pathological evaluation, tumor stage, and biochemical indicators, individuals who had Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance exhibited a higher propensity to opt for radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy compared to those covered by the Urban-Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance. During the follow-up phase of the study, a total of 1438 deaths were documented, with 1106 ascribed to esophageal cancer. Additionally, individuals with Urban-Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance had a significantly elevated risk of esophageal cancer, particularly mortality, compared to those without Urban-Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance.