Comparative analysis of right atrial function in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy using cardiac magnetic resonance-feature tracking

利用心脏磁共振特征追踪技术对致心律失常性右室心肌病和扩张型心肌病患者的右心房功能进行比较分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the importance of right atrial (RA) function is being increasingly acknowledged, comparative studies investigating RA dysfunction in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remain limited. This study aimed to compare RA function between ARVC and DCM using cardiac magnetic resonance-feature tracking (MR-FT). METHODS: This retrospective study (June 2018 to December 2022) included 38 patients with ARVC, 98 patients with DCM, and 72 sex- and age-matched healthy controls (HC). RA deformation parameters, including RA reservoir strain (εs), conduit strain (εe), and booster strain (εa), as well as RA peak positive strain rate (SRs), peak early negative strain rate (SRe), and peak late negative strain rate (SRa), were assessed using the MR-FT technique. Group differences in RA deformation parameters were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis test. Pearson and Spearman correlation methods were performed to explore the correlation between RA deformation parameters and RA emptying fractions (RAEFs). RESULTS: Patients with ARVC exhibited greater right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volumes than those with DCM (P<0.001). Compared with HC, both ARVC and DCM patient cohorts had lower RA εs {49.5%±14.4% vs. 26.6% [interquartile range (IQR, 15.8-29.8%)] vs. 19.0% (IQR, 14.0-27.7%)}, εe [32.7%±12.9% vs. 17.7% (IQR, 11.9-22.1%) vs. 8.9% (IQR, 5.6-13.3%)], SRs [2.1 (IQR, 1.7-2.8) vs. 1.7±0.8 vs. 1.1 (IQR, 0.8-1.6) s(-1)], and SRe [-2.6±1.2 vs. -1.3 (IQR, -1.9 to -0.9) vs. -0.7 (IQR, -1.3 to -0.5) s(-1)] (all P<0.05), with DCM demonstrating lower values than those with ARVC (all P<0.05). RA deformation parameters were notably correlated to RAEFs among the three groups (HC, ARVC, and DCM, RA εs and RAEF total: r=0.73, 0.81, and 0.74; RA εe and RAEF passive: r=0.66, 0.76, and 0.77; RA εa and RAEF booster: r=0.55, 0.73, and 0.61) (all P<0.001). MR-FT-derived RA strain and SR measurements showed excellent reproducibility, with interclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.913 to 0.987. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the more pronounced RV dilation in patients with ARVC, those with DCM exhibited significantly greater impairment in RA function with lower MR-FT-derived RA strain and SR values. ARVC and DCM showed different pathological patterns in RA dysfunction.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。