Abstract
This research investigates the control of thickness and weight in plastic extrusion vacuum-thermoforming products to identify optimal key parameters for cost reduction and energy savings. The initial step involves identifying crucial influencing factors. In this step, the Delphi technique was employed through a questionnaire administered to a panel of expert scholars to ensure minimal error and maximal reliability in determining key influencing factors. Consensus was sought to establish appropriateness and consistency. Subsequently, the Taguchi method was applied for quality design and planning of the extrusion vacuum-forming process. The experimental design parameters were selected using an L(18) (2(1) × 3(7)) orthogonal array, and the desired quality characteristics were determined. Comparative analysis of quantitative production data from two consecutive experiments was conducted, and based on F-values and contribution analysis, the combination of control factors maximizing the Signal-to-Noise (S/N) ratio was identified. The objective is to seek optimal parameters for improving the quality of the plastic polypropylene (PP cup lid) manufacturing process, reducing process variability, and identifying the most robust production conditions. Through multiple actual production prediction experiments, it was determined that five control factors, "polypropylene new material ratio," "T-die lips adjustment thickness", "mirror wheel temperature stability", "molding vacuum pressure time", and "forming mold area design", contribute to the maximization of the S/N ratio, i.e., minimizing variability. Statistical validation confirms a significant improvement in product quality and weight control. Noteworthily, the quality control model and experimental design parameters established in this study are also applicable to other plastic products and bio-based materials, such as PET, HIPS, and biodegradable PLA lids with added calcium carbonate. The results of the experimental production demonstrate its ability to consistently control product weight within the range of 3.4 ± 0.1 g, approaching the specified tolerance limits. This capability results in approximately 2.6% cost savings in product weight, contributing significantly to achieving a company's KPI goals for environmental conservation, energy efficiency, and operational cost reduction. Therefore, the findings of this study represent a substantial and tangible contribution.