Trap versus trade-off: cohort evidence on overeducation, income returns, and group disparities after China's higher education expansion

陷阱还是权衡:中国高等教育扩张后过度教育、收入回报和群体差异的队列研究证据

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Higher education expansion is a pivotal strategy for fostering economic growth and national competitiveness. Yet, its consequences for social equality-particularly through the mechanism of overeducation, where educational attainment exceeds job requirements-remain contested. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates how the 1999 mass higher education expansion in China reshaped the incidence, income returns, and group disparities of overeducation by employing a theoretical framework of 'trap versus trade-off.' METHODS: Data were sourced from the Chinese General Social Survey (2010-2021). The study compared 19 birth cohorts that entered the labor market before and after the expansion. A total of 50,932 participants were included, aged 17-60 years and born between 1950 and 2003. Among all participants, 26,566 (52.16%) were female, and 19,166 (37.63%) were from rural areas. A cohort-based design by using the Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort model was applied to resolve collinearity among age, period, and cohort effects. RESULTS: The findings revealed four key insights. First, the expansion produced persistent cohort-level effects, embedding overeducation as a structural feature of the labor market. Second, the effect of expansion on overeducation interacted with other historical and policy shifts, highlighting the contextual nature of expansion outcomes. Third, and central to the study, we observed a transformation in the income effect of overeducation: it shifted from a trade-off (associated with income returns) for pre-expansion cohorts to a trap (associated with an income penalty) for post-expansion cohorts. Finally, the impact of overeducation on income returns varies across groups; while the aggregate trend reflects a trap, evidence suggests that overeducation may still function as a trade-off for certain disadvantaged groups, such as women and rural residents, potentially mitigating income inequality. CONCLUSION: These findings imply that to fulfill the fundamental aims of higher education expansion-raising educational attainment and reducing social inequality-policymakers must design targeted, group-sensitive interventions to address the unequal risks and opportunities generated during the expansion process.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。