Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification Combined with Vitrectomy for Cataract Complicated with Fundus Disease: Superior Efficacy in Patients with Vitreous Opacity and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化联合玻璃体切除术治疗合并眼底疾病的白内障:在玻璃体混浊患者中疗效更佳及成本效益分析

阅读:1

Abstract

AIM: To compare the efficacy of femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) combined with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) combined with PPV in the treatment of cataract patients with fundus diseases. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 379 affected eyes from Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital from 01/02/2022 to 01/02/2025, divided into group A (n=182, 48%, FLACS+PPV) and group B (n=197, 52%, CPS+PPV), to compare surgical costs, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), complications, and surgical time. RESULTS: Postoperative visual acuity improved significantly in both groups (all P < 0.0001). For vitreous opacity (VO) patients, the BCVA improvement in group A (0.34±0.51) was significantly better than that in group B (0.15±0.52, P=0.03), with a shorter surgical time (45.22±8.15 vs 52.72±7.17 min, P < 0.0001) and lower complication rate (7.14% vs 11.68%). Overall, group A had a shorter surgical time (47.75±10.06 vs 59.22±11.6 min, P < 0.0001) and better postoperative BCVA (0.36±0.45 vs 0.49±0.48, P=0.0001) than group B, but higher surgical costs (21,600±9180 vs 15,399±2996 yuan, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: FLACS+PPV has excellent therapeutic effects but is expensive, while CPS+PPV has a high cost-effectiveness, and clinical selection should be based on the patient's condition.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。