Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient education plays a key role in helping individuals understand their health conditions and participate in treatment. With the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI), tools like ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA) and Google Gemini (Mountain View, CA, USA) are increasingly being used to generate patient information. This study assessed how readable and reliable AI-generated brochures on bariatric surgery are. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in September 2024 to generate patient brochures on six common bariatric procedures using ChatGPT and Google Gemini. Each brochure was evaluated for readability using the Flesch-Kincaid metrics, and "similarity" was assessed using Quillbot to estimate text overlap with existing literature (higher similarity indicating greater overlap). Reliability was measured using the modified DISCERN score, where higher scores reflect more trustworthy health information. RESULTS: ChatGPT generally produced longer brochures with more sentences, while Gemini generated shorter text with slightly longer sentences. Despite these structural differences, both tools produced content with similar readability levels - approximately college-level - and comparable reliability scores. Gemini showed higher similarity with pre-existing text, while ChatGPT produced more original phrasing. Overall, both tools generated patient information of good reliability but with limited accessibility for individuals with lower literacy. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT and Google Gemini can produce reliable educational material on bariatric surgery, but the readability remains higher than ideal for the average patient. Human editing and simplification may be necessary to make AI-generated brochures more accessible and suitable for routine patient education.