Efficacy of the novel MIGS implant Wistend compared to Kahook Dual Blade in the treatment of experimental ocular hypertension in rabbits

新型微创青光眼手术植入物Wistend与Kahook双刃植入物治疗兔实验性眼高压的疗效比较

阅读:1

Abstract

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of novel microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) device implants Wistend and Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) in an experimental ocular hypertension model. Twelve New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into four groups (blank, sham-operated, Wistend and KDB groups) after establishment of an ocular hypertension animal model. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was observed over three months. Eaton and Draize scores, Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), fundus photography were used to evaluate ocular health and confirm microstent placement. Both the Wistend and the KDB significantly lowered IOP over the three-month follow-up. At 7,10,20, and 30 days post-operation, there were significant differences in IOP reduction between the Wistend and the KDB groups (P < 0.05). Postoperative assessments showed that the anterior and posterior segments of the eyes remained healthy, with no notable adverse events. Wistend and KDB both effectively reduced IOP in experimental ocular hypertension, and a stable and significant IOP reduction was maintained throughout the 3-month postoperative follow-up period. The findings may provide potentially experimental rationale for the selection of the MIGS devices Wistend and KDB for glaucoma patients.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。