Active Nerve Management for Below-knee Amputation: A Comparison of Approaches

膝下截肢患者的主动神经管理:不同方法的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

Targeted muscle reinnervation and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) are well-described techniques used to treat or prevent postamputation neuroma and phantom limb pain after below-knee amputation (BKA). These techniques can be performed via a posterior approach (PA) or a through-the-wound approach (TTWA). We performed a review of patients who underwent active nerve management at the time of BKA between February 2019 and May 2023. Patients were stratified into PA and TTWA cohorts. A total of 36 patients underwent active nerve management at the time of BKA-16 PA and 20 TTWA. The PA was found to take significantly longer than the TTWA, with an operative time of 251 minutes compared with 208 minutes, respectively (P = 0.03). All patients in both the TTWA and PA cohorts underwent targeted muscle reinnervation. However, in the TTWA cohort, 95% also underwent RPNI compared with 56% in the PA group (P = 0.01). Patients who underwent the TTWA were more likely to experience wound dehiscence postoperatively (TTWA, 40% of subjects; PA 25% of subjects; P = 0.01). There was no difference in infection rates or time to prosthetic clearance between groups. Though more time-consuming, the PA provides more direct access to recipient motor nerves, as evidenced by the lower use of RPNI nerve management in this cohort. These findings should be considered by surgeons who perform active nerve management at the time of BKA.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。