The Interplay of Four Main Pathways Recomposes Immune Landscape in Primary and Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

The four major pathways in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) including chromatin remodeling, DNA damage repair, activation of mTOR signaling, and telomere maintenance were mediated by some critical molecules and constituted critical processes of regulation in cancer-causing processes. However, the interplay and potential role of these pathway-related molecules in the tumor microenvironment of the primary and metastatic site remained unknown.

This study was the first to perform a comprehensive analysis of the four major pathways in GEP-NENs. We demonstrated the potential function of these pathway-related molecules in immune landscapes. Our findings indicated that the primary and metastatic GEP-NENs had distinct antitumor phenotypes. This work highlighted the interplay and potential clinical utility of these pathway-related molecules in GEP-NENs.

We systematically evaluated the mRNA expression of 34 molecules associated with the four pathways in 227 GEP-NEN samples from 5 datasets. We assigned the samples into two expression patterns of pathway-related molecules by an unsupervised clustering method. Subsequently, we explored the specific cell-related molecules, especially immune and stromal cells using the WGCNA method, based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) responsible for the different patterns of pathway-related molecules, which provided a new method to qualify the pathway-related subtypes of individual tumors, then the PC_Score and PI_Score scoring systems were also constructed using obtained specific cell-related molecules. Furthermore, we performed the association of pathway-related subtypes with characteristics of immune landscape in primary and metastatic GEP-NENs.

We demonstrated that the specific pathway-related molecules (SMARCA4, MLH1, TSC1, ATRX, and ATR) were associated with cytolytic activity. Then we identified the two distinct patterns of pathway-related molecules, which were characteristic with a significantly distinct immune landscape. Using WGCNA, we also identified the fibroblast-related molecules, including ASPN, COL10A1, COL3A1, EDNRA, MYL9, PRELP, RAB31, SPARC, and THBS2, and immune-related molecules including CASP1, CCL5, CTSS, CYBRD1, PMP22, and TFEC. Based on these specific markers, we identified four distinct pathway-related subtypes, characterized by immune and fibrotic enriched (I/FE), immune enriched (IE), fibrotic enriched (FE), and immune and fibrotic desert (I/FD), of which I/FE was characteristic with the highest PC_Score and PI_Score whereas I/FD presents the opposite trend. I/FE was positively correlated with immune landscape of T-cell activation and immunosuppression. Furthermore, the I/FE marked GEP-NENs with increased immune activation scores (T-cell costimulation, MHC I presentation, and APC costimulation). Importantly, the four distinct pathway-related subtypes were not conserved in different tumor sites, because I/FE was lacking in the liver metastatic site even though IE, FE, and I/FD also could be observed in the metastatic site. Conclusions: This study was the first to perform a comprehensive analysis of the four major pathways in GEP-NENs. We demonstrated the potential function of these pathway-related molecules in immune landscapes. Our findings indicated that the primary and metastatic GEP-NENs had distinct antitumor phenotypes. This work highlighted the interplay and potential clinical utility of these pathway-related molecules in GEP-NENs.