Do NO, N(2)O, N(2) and CO(2) fluxes differ in soils sourced from cropland and varying riparian buffer vegetation? An incubation study

农田土壤和不同河岸缓冲植被土壤中NO、N₂O、N₂和CO₂的通量是否存在差异?一项培养实验研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Riparian buffers are expedient interventions for water quality functions in agricultural landscapes. However, the choice of vegetation and management affects soil microbial communities, which in turn affect nutrient cycling and the production and emission of gases such as nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N(2)O), nitrogen gas (N(2)) and carbon dioxide (CO(2)). To investigate the potential fluxes of the above-mentioned gases, soil samples were collected from a cropland and downslope grass, willow and woodland riparian buffers from a replicated plot scale experimental facility. The soils were re-packed into cores and to investigate their potential to produce the aforementioned gases via potential denitrification, a potassium nitrate (KNO(3) (-)) and glucose (labile carbon)-containing amendment, was added prior to incubation in a specialized laboratory DENItrification System (DENIS). The resulting NO, N(2)O, N(2) and CO(2) emissions were measured simultaneously, with the most NO (2.9 ± 0.31 mg NO m(-2)) and N(2)O (1413.4 ± 448.3 mg N(2)O m(-2)) generated by the grass riparian buffer and the most N(2) (698.1 ± 270.3 mg N(2) m(-2)) and CO(2) (27,558.3 ± 128.9 mg CO(2) m(-2)) produced by the willow riparian buffer. Thus, the results show that grass riparian buffer soils have a greater NO(3) (-) removal capacity, evidenced by their large potential denitrification rates, while the willow riparian buffers may be an effective riparian buffer as its soils potentially promote complete denitrification to N(2), especially in areas with similar conditions to the current study.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。