Conclusions
Ultra-high dose rate electron FLASH caused lower pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in serum and skin tissue which might mediate differential tissue damage between FLASH-IR and CONV-IR.
Methods
An Elekta Synergy linac was used to deliver 6 MeV CONV-IR and modified to deliver FLASH-IR. Female FvB mice were randomly assigned to three different groups: a non-irradiated control, CONV-IR, or FLASH-IR. The FLASH-IR beam was produced by single pulses repeated manually with a 20-s interval (Strategy 1), or single-trigger multiple pulses with a 10 ms interval (Strategy 2). Mice were immobilized in the prone position in a custom-designed applicator with Gafchromic films positioned under the body. The prescribed doses for the mice were 6 to 18 Gy and verified using Gafchromic films. Cytokine expression of three pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], interferon-γ [IFN-γ], interleukin-6 [IL-6]) and one anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) in serum samples and skin tissue were examined within 1 month post-IR.
Purpose
Ultra-high dose rate FLASH irradiation (FLASH-IR) has been shown to cause less normal tissue damage compared with conventional irradiation (CONV-IR), this is known as the "FLASH effect." It has attracted immense research interest because its underlying mechanism is scarcely known. The purpose of this study was to determine whether FLASH-IR and CONV-IR induce differential inflammatory cytokine expression using a modified clinical linac. Materials and
Results
The modified linac delivered radiation at an intra-pulse dose rate of around 1 × 106 Gy/s and a dose per pulse over 2 Gy at a source-to-surface distance (SSD) of 13 to 15 cm. The achieved dose coverage was 90%-105% of the maximum dose within -20 to 20 mm in the X direction and 95% within -30 to 30 mm in the Y direction. The absolute deviations between the prescribed dose and the actual dose were 2.21%, 6.04%, 2.09%, and 2.73% for 6, 9, 12, and 15 Gy as measured by EBT3 films, respectively; and 4.00%, 4.49%, and 2.30% for 10, 14, and 18 Gy as measured by the EBT XD films, respectively. The reductions in the CONV-IR versus the FLASH-IR group were 4.89%, 10.28%, -7.8%, and -22.17% for TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-10 in the serum on D6, respectively; 37.26%, 67.16%, 56.68%, and -18.95% in the serum on D31, respectively; and 62.67%, 35.65%, 37.75%, and -12.20% for TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-10 in the skin tissue, respectively. Conclusions: Ultra-high dose rate electron FLASH caused lower pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in serum and skin tissue which might mediate differential tissue damage between FLASH-IR and CONV-IR.