Conclusion
[Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] as measured by the step test are statistically significantly different between SSc patients with and without PH. [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] may be useful screening tools for PH in the SSc population.
Methods
We performed a cross-sectional study of 27 patients with limited or dcSSc who underwent a right heart catheterization within 24 months prior to study entry. The study visit consisted of questionnaire completion; history; physical examination; step test performance; and phlebotomy. [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], self-report data and biomarkers were compared between patients with and without PH.
Results
SSc patients with PH had a statistically significantly lower median (interquartile range) [Formula: see text] than SSc patients without PH [-2.1 (-5.1 to 0.7) vs 1.2 (-0.7 to 5.4) mmHg, P = 0.035], and a statistically significantly higher median (interquartile range) [Formula: see text] [53.4 (39-64.1) vs 36.4 (31.9-41.1), P = 0.035]. There were no statistically significant differences in self-report data or biomarkers between groups.
