Abstract
Quantitative imaging measurements can be facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, but how they might impact decision-making and be perceived by radiologists remains uncertain. After creation of a dedicated inspiratory-expiratory CT examination and concurrent deployment of a quantitative AI algorithm for assessing air trapping, five cardiothoracic radiologists retrospectively evaluated severity of air trapping on 17 examination studies. Air trapping severity of each lobe was evaluated in three stages: qualitatively (visually); semiquantitatively, allowing manual region-of-interest measurements; and quantitatively, using results from an AI algorithm. Readers were surveyed on each case for their perceptions of the AI algorithm. The algorithm improved interreader agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients: visual, 0.28; semiquantitative, 0.40; quantitative, 0.84; P < .001) and improved correlation with pulmonary function testing (forced expiratory volume in 1 second-to-forced vital capacity ratio) (visual r = -0.26, semiquantitative r = -0.32, quantitative r = -0.44). Readers perceived moderate agreement with the AI algorithm (Likert scale average, 3.7 of 5), a mild impact on their final assessment (average, 2.6), and a neutral perception of overall utility (average, 3.5). Though the AI algorithm objectively improved interreader consistency and correlation with pulmonary function testing, individual readers did not immediately perceive this benefit, revealing a potential barrier to clinical adoption. Keywords: Technology Assessment, Quantification © RSNA, 2021.