Abstract
BACKGROUND: Muscle wasting may explain the paradoxical mortality of patients with high estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) derived from equation methods. However, empirical evidence and solutions remain insufficient. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the performance of equation methods for predicting all-cause mortality; we used 24-h creatinine clearance (24-h CrCl), equation-based eGFRs, and a new eGFR estimating equation weighting for population 24-h urine creatinine excretion rate (U-CER). From 2003 to 2018, we identified 4986 patients whose data constituted the first 24-h CrCl measurement data in the Clinical Research Data Repository of China Medical University Hospital and were followed up for at least 5 years after careful exclusion. Three GFR estimation equations [the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study, and Taiwanese MDRD], 24-h CrCl, and 24-h U-CER-adjusted eGFR were used. RESULTS: A high correlation was observed among the eGFR levels derived from the equation methods (0.995-1.000); however, the correlation decreased to 0.895-0.914 when equation methods were compared with the 24-h CrCl or 24-h U-CER-adjusted equation-based eGFR. In the Bland-Altman plots, the average discrepancy between the equation methods and the 24-h CrCl method was close to zero (maximal bias range: 5.12 for the Taiwanese MDRD equation vs. 24-h CrCl), but the range in limit of agreement was wide, from ±43.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) for the CKD-EPI equation to ±54.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2) for the Taiwanese MDRD equation. A J-shaped dose-response relationship was observed between all equation-based eGFRs and all-cause mortality. Only 24-h CrCl exhibited a non-linear negative dose-response relationship with all-cause mortality. After adjustment for 24-h U-CER in the statistical model, the paradoxical increase in mortality risk for an eGFR of >90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) returned to null. When 24-h U-CER was used directly to correct eGFR, the monotonic non-linear negative relationship with all-cause mortality was almost identical to that of 24-h CrCl. CONCLUSIONS: The 24-h U-CER-adjusted eGFR and 24-h CrCl are viable options for informing mortality risk. The 24-h U-CER adjustment method can be practically implemented to eGFR-based care and effectively mitigate the inherent confounding biases from individual's muscle mass amount due to both sex and racial differences.