Effects of model size and composition on quality of head-and-neck knowledge-based plans

模型大小和组成对头颈部知识型计划质量的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: Knowledge-based planning (KBP) aims to automate and standardize treatment planning. New KBP users are faced with many questions: How much does model size matter, and are multiple models needed to accommodate specific physician preferences? In this study, six head-and-neck KBP models were trained to address these questions. METHODS: The six models differed in training size and plan composition: The KBP(Full) (n = 203 plans), KBP(101) (n = 101), KBP(50) (n = 50), and KBP(25) (n = 25) were trained with plans from two head-and-neck physicians. KBP(A) and KBP(B) each contained n = 101 plans from only one physician, respectively. An independent set of 39 patients treated to 6000-7000 cGy by a third physician was re-planned with all KBP models for validation. Standard head-and-neck dosimetric parameters were used to compare resulting plans. KBP(Full) plans were compared to the clinical plans to evaluate overall model quality. Additionally, clinical and KBP(Full) plans were presented to another physician for blind review. Dosimetric comparison of KBP(Full) against KBP(101) , KBP(50) , and KBP(25) investigated the effect of model size. Finally, KBP(A) versus KBP(B) tested whether training KBP models on plans from one physician only influences the resulting output. Dosimetric differences were tested for significance using a paired t-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Compared to manual plans, KBP(Full) significantly increased PTV Low D95% and left parotid mean dose but decreased dose cochlea, constrictors, and larynx. The physician preferred the KBP(Full) plan over the manual plan in 20/39 cases. Dosimetric differences between KBP(Full) , KBP(101) , KBP(50) , and KBP(25) plans did not exceed 187 cGy on aggregate, except for the cochlea. Further, average differences between KBP(A) and KBP(B) were below 110 cGy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, all models were shown to produce high-quality plans. Differences between model outputs were small compared to the prescription. This indicates only small improvements when increasing model size and minimal influence of the physician when choosing treatment plans for training head-and-neck KBP models.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。