Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reliable preoperative facial nerve mapping may help avoid or minimize facial nerve injury during parotid tumor resection. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence in localizing parotid gland tumors through direct visualization of the intraparotid facial nerve in comparison with indirect methods of estimating the facial nerve location. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 91 parotid gland tumors in 90 patients who underwent surgical resection and preoperative MR imaging, including the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence. The tumor locations were categorized as deep or superficial on the basis of direct and 3 indirect methods: the facial nerve line, retromandibular vein, and Utrecht line. Surgical localization was considered the criterion standard. The diagnostic performance for localizing deep lobe lesions using direct and indirect methods was calculated and compared using the McNemar test. RESULTS: Surgical localization confirmed 75 superficial lesions and 16 deep lesions. The interobserver variability of the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence was excellent (κ = 0.870). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for localizing deep lobe lesions using the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation method were 97.8%, 87.5%, 100%, 100%, and 97.4%, respectively. These findings were significantly higher than the facial nerve line in sensitivity, the retromandibular vein in sensitivity, and the Utrecht line in accuracy and specificity (P < .05). Overall, the direct method was the most accurate, sensitive, and specific in localizing parotid gland tumors. CONCLUSIONS: We can achieve higher diagnostic performance in localizing parotid gland tumors by directly visualizing the intraparotid facial nerve using the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence compared with indirect methods.