Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research

评估用户参与研究的质量和影响的关键性评价指南

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The involvement of service users in the design and conduct of health research has developed significantly in the UK in recent years. Involving service users is now seen as a core component of good research practice for all forms of health research. Given the important role that users have in health research, it is necessary to develop guidelines for their effective involvement. Whilst guidelines are currently being formulated, there remain no criteria with which to assess user involvement in published studies and funding applications. OBJECTIVE: This study offers guidelines for appraising the quality and impact of user involvement in published papers and grant applications. METHODS: Appraisal guidelines for user involvement have been developed on the basis of available literature and experiences from studies involving cancer patients and carers in the design and conduct of research. FINDINGS: Nine appraisal criteria have been developed. Criteria include issues such as 'Is the rationale for involving users clearly demonstrated?', 'Is the level of user involvement appropriate?', 'Is the recruitment strategy appropriate?', and 'Is the nature of training appropriate?' CONCLUSION: Generating and applying guidelines is vital if the impact of user involvement agenda in health research is to be understood.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。