Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the reliability of a nine-point summary scale for grading intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) image morphologic features based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid. METHODS: Two trained graders independently divided spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scans into nine subfields and then graded each subfield for the presence of intraretinal hyperreflective foci (HRF), reticular pseudodrusen (RPD), and incomplete or complete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy (iRORA or cRORA). Grading results were assessed by summing the subfield grades into a nine-point summary score and also by using an eye-level binary grade for presence of the finding in any subfield. Gwet's first-order agreement coefficient (AC1) was calculated to assess intergrader agreement. RESULTS: Images of 79 eyes from 52 patients were evaluated. Intergrader agreement was higher when the OCT grades were summarized with a nine-point summary score (Gwet's AC1 0.92, 0.89, 0.99, and 0.99 for HRF, RPD, iRORA, and cRORA, respectively) compared with the eye-level binary grade (Gwet's AC1 0.75, 0.76, 0.97, and 0.96 for HRF, RPD, iRORA, and cRORA, respectively), with significant differences detected for HRF and RPD. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a nine-point summary score showed higher reliability in grading when compared to the binary subfield- and eye-level data, and thus may offer more precise estimation of AMD disease staging. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that a nine-point summary score could be a useful means of disease staging by using findings on OCT in clinical studies of AMD.