Abstract
PURPOSE: Performance comparison of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual field (VF) summary metrics for detecting glaucomatous progression. METHODS: Thirty healthy control eyes (mean deviation [MD], -1.25 ± 2.03; pattern standard deviation [PSD] , 1.78 ± 0.77) and 91 patient eyes comprised of 54 glaucoma patients and 37 glaucoma suspects (MD, -1.58 ± 1.96; PSD, 2.82 ± 1.92) with a follow-up of at least 1 year formed a group to evaluate progression with event analyses (P-Event). A subset of eyes with an additional criterion of a minimum of four tests was used for trend analyses (P-Trend) (30 healthy controls and 73 patients). For P-Event analysis, test-retest variability thresholds (lower 5th percentile) were estimated with repeat tests within a 4-month period. A P-Event eye was considered a "progressor" if the difference between follow-up and baseline tests exceeded the variability thresholds. For the P-Trend analysis, rates of change were calculated based on least-squares regression. Negative rates with significant (P < 0.05) values were considered progressing. For a reference standard, 17 patient eyes were classified as definitely progressing based on clear evidence of structural and corresponding functional progression. RESULTS: Isolated OCT and VF summary metrics were either inadequately sensitive or not too specific. Combinations of OCT-OCT and OCT-VF metrics markedly improved specificity to nearly 100%. A novel combination of OCT metrics (circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer) showed high precision, with 13 of the 15 statistical progressors confirmed as true positives. CONCLUSIONS: Although relying solely on metrics is not recommended for clinical purposes, in situations requiring very high specificity and precision, combinations of OCT-OCT metrics can be used. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: All available OCT and VF metrics can miss eyes with progressive glaucomatous damage and/or can falsely identify progression in stable eyes.