Abstract
PURPOSE: Dry eye disease (DED) is a heterogeneous condition with poorly characterized subtypes. The DREAM study was a large multicenter randomized clinical trial that did not find omega-3 to be more effective than placebo in treating symptomatic DED. We performed secondary analysis of DREAM data to characterize DED subtypes and their omega-3 response. METHODS: A total of 535 patients with moderate-to-severe DED were randomized to omega-3 or placebo treatment for one year. We used latent profile analysis to identify subtypes based on baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index, tear break-up time (TBUT), anesthetized Schirmer's test, corneal and conjunctival staining, and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). We evaluated omega-3's effect for each subtype using generalized linear regression. RESULTS: Five clinically meaningful DED subtypes were identified. They differed significantly in sex (P < 0.001) and race (P = 0.02). Subtype 1 had the most severe DED signs yet milder symptoms and was associated with more Sjögren's syndrome (21%, P < 0.001). Subtype 2 had the mildest DED signs except MGD. Subtype 3 had the most severe symptoms, out of proportion to DED signs. Subtype 4 had relatively milder symptoms and MGD. Subtype 5 had severe MGD and TBUT and was associated with rosacea (29%, P = 0.04). Omega-3 was not significantly more beneficial than placebo for any subtype. CONCLUSIONS: Five clinically meaningful DED subtypes differed significantly in demographics, symptoms, signs, and systemic disease associations. Omega-3 was not significantly more effective than placebo for any subtype. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: T3 translational research identifying subtypes in the DREAM study can improve DED clinical classification and targeted management.